The most brutal gift.”
(Metalocalypse)
The most brutal gift.”
(Metalocalypse)
There is no daddy.
Complex neural networking.
Neural networking complex.
I love it when he does the “Yes!” clenching fist arm gesture after his force-wills tge ball into the hole.
A case of a “what the f***s?!” and lack of being able to respond to and/or do anything about it.
A sign to let go of doubt and trust in yourself and the universe. Embrace the opportunities that come your way and have faith in the process.
Watch – somehow dog saliva cultured in a car’s cup of water over several days re-lines the intestines with mucosal magic as a cure-all for intestinal malfunctioning!

I would have thought that the first paragraph required the wine, rather than the second. Maybe even hard whiskey…!
(For cat’s liver cancer)
Wait before consuming more.

So after shaken, drink the entire contents within a certain short time period. When does one refrigerate? Immediately upon opening? Before drinking? Between sips? After the bottle is empty?
The Piz-za is in the o-ven – I repeat – the piz-za is in the o-ven!
Just because something indicating an injustice may be seen, this does not always mean it has necessarily occurred.
For example, two dogs are thrown their biscuit each for returning inside as requested.
One biscuit lands where the hound sees and consumes it quickly.
The other biscuit breaks as it lands in front of the wolf: a piece lands where she can see and thus consumes it; but the other piece slides between her legs and behind to where only the hound sees it – and then scoots between the wolf’s hind legs and snaps it up.
Whereupon the wolf is confused as to what has just happened.
Where did her piece go?
So I give the wolf another biscuit, which gratifies the wolf and erases the perplexed sense of loss from her face.
But now the hound sees this “second giving” in which she has not been included and feels wrongly left out of the equation.
A human could say that the hound had been “greedy;” that she “should not have” eaten the wolf’s second piece; and therefore, that the hound deserves this sense of disparity.
Further, the tallied data is that the hound got one and a half pieces of biscuit, while the wolf initially only received one half.
Therefore, technically, feeding the wolf another biscuit while then excluding the hound “evens” their intake – and it could be said that justice has been quite literally “served.”
However, dogs do not think in human “abstractions” once food hits the ground, senses become engaged, and primal directives take over.
Dogs register opportunities, and they assess and act upon them according to their long-encoded internal “laws of canine survival.”
In this case, the hound gauged the location of the piece as being nowhere near the wolf’s mouth, so it was “fair” “game” as long as she could act quickly and smoothly enough to not incite the wolf’s ire.
According to the hound, she had executed her successful play according to “pack rules” and therefore had earned the piece.
So why has she been excluded from second serving? What could she have possibly done to deserve such treatment?
Such questions are now being conveyed audibly by certain low-toned groan-whines as the hound quietly grouses to herself, yet volume increases as she directs hurt inquiries to me.
The only way for my actions to be seen as “just and fair” is to give each dog a third serving of biscuit!
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8xnzObyR_a/?igsh=cXg0bnR4aGxuNXYz
My kind of “tech savvy!”
I am now wearing reading glasses that have a wad of black tape for resting upon the bridge of my nose to compensate for the rubber pad having popped off from them.
“All you need is gloves…gloves, gloves, gloves – all you need are gloves.”
“I’m done – out of the scene,” said one with exasperated finality.
“Are you sure?” asked the other with brows raised quizzically.
They both looked around for a moment and then burst out laughing,
“Nah!!” they loud chortle-whooped in unison.
“I didn’t think so!” the second one ribbed while gasping.
Note the subtitles 😀